Being agriculture is a major contributor to the economy of North Dakota, and our soil is the foundation of agriculture, be it the observation of the North Dakota Chapter that:

1. Many soils of the State of North Dakota have been and are being mismanaged, resulting in erosion and depletion of the amount of productive A horizon (topsoil);
   
2. Portions of the sedimentation resulting from erosion (wind and water) is reaching the State's rivers and lakes, lowering water quality, and decreasing their potential as recreational use area; and
   
3. Agriculture is the number one industry in the State.
   

Be it the position of the North Dakota Chapter of Soil and Water Conservation Society that:

North Dakota Chapter Position on
Fish, Wildlife, and Outdoor Recreation (Adopted 9/81)

It is the position of the North Dakota Chapter that:

The North Dakota Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation Society is dedicated to the wise use of natural resources. The Chapter’s objectives include economic development, environmental quality, social well-being, and soil and water conservation. We believe this soil erosion policy should achieve a reasonable balance of these objectives. This position statement describes our vision for the future and defines the major strategic initiatives necessary to set future direction for managing and sustaining our soil resource and protection form erosion.

North Dakota Chapter Position on
the 1995 Farm Bill (Adopted 5/95)

	We recognize the need for economic viability of agricultural producers in a global economy,
	We recognize the need for a secure food and fiber supply at a reasonable cost to the consumers,
	Public funds should be targeted to where natural resource problems are the most significant (soil, water, air, plants, and animals), and
	Unfunded mandates are unacceptable both in terms of incentive-based programs and the staff needed to properly implement them.

With these thoughts in mind, the North Dakota Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation Society supports the implementation of the following principles in the 1995 Farm Bill:

Federal agricultural policy should be based on promoting Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that will achieve the sustainable use of soil, water, air, plant, and animal resources,

2. Give priority to research and programs that will achieve sustainable use of resources (ahead of
"non-use" programs such as CRP), and

3. BMP/conservation incentive payments must be subject to performance-based evaluation.

In accordance with these principles, the Dakota Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation Society recommend the following changes to programs in the 1995 Farm Bill:

Phase out commodity-acreage programs and replace them with incentive payments that are prorated according to the environmental benefits of the practices applied by the landowners,

2. If the Conservation Reserve Program is extended, modify it to include the following:

A. Scheduling of non-pay years alternated with at least two paid years on grass acreage. Allow
appropriately managed haying, grazing, or burning during non-pay years to maintain
grass/legume health. And,

B. Require restoration of all drained wetland acreage with 100% of the cost reimbursable by the
USDA,

Modify USDA Conservation Easements to allow haying during alternate years on areas that are now designated "grazing only" but are not feasible to graze in a timely manner,

4. Drop the federal crop insurance enrollment requirement for producers earning incentive/cost share
payments for utilizing BMPs, and

5. Drop the Wetland Reserve Program because it duplicates the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Wetland Easement Program.

North Dakota Chapter Position on
Water Resources  
(Adopted Dec. 10, 2000)

The North Dakota Chapter of the Soil & Water Conservation Society is dedicated to promoting the wise use of natural resources. Our objectives include economic development, environmental quality, social well-being, and soil and water conservation. We believe that water policy and management should achieve a reasonable balance of these objectives. We believe that planning for wise water management is essential for North Dakota to respond to potential increasing demands on water resources for agriculture, industry, municipalities, recreation, fish, and wildlife. The North Dakota Chapter of the Soil & Water Conservation Society supports the following principles for water management:

1. All citizens have a responsibility to this and future generations to manage air, animals, energy, plants, soil, and water for optimum sustained use. Optimal uses sustain healthy ecosystems and a healthy society.
2. The management and uses of water should not cause the waste or degradation of other resources, and vice-versa. The interactions between air, animals, energy, plants, soils, & water that result from their management and uses must be recognized and understood.
3. Water management policies and water projects should promote self-sufficiency in our agriculture, communities, and lifestyles. Government policies and programs should promote a resilient ability to live with variations in water supplies that inevitably result from precipitation extremes. For example, xeriscaping should be promoted as an alternative to subsidizing irrigated lawns. Pro-active approaches, such as floodplain zoning, should be used to prevent increasing or perpetuating vulnerability to flood damage.
4. Public water projects must not contribute to indirect, large-scale resource degradation, such as urbanization of prime farmland.
5. The maintenance of worthwhile, existing public water projects and the environmentally sound decommission of obsolete water projects should be completed before new projects are started.
6. Citizens must be afforded the right to be informed of pending water management decisions that might affect them, and must be allowed to participate at all levels of water resource planning- especially within their watershed and aquifer zone. The public must be well-informed to properly manage resources. A comprehensive, unbiased water information & education program should be provided to North Dakotans.
7. Water uses, management policies and projects should not infringe on property rights, either within or beyond political borders.
8. Water projects and water management should be based on a precautionary approach. Resource degradation and waste should be avoided by choosing the best plan from a reasonable array of studied alternatives & mitigation measures, including on-site, off-site, and cumulative effects. Water quality protection incentives such as programs to seal abandoned wells should be given a high priority.
9. The quality and quantity of surface water and ground water must be protected by responsible government. Diligent monitoring is essential. Laws with sufficient scope to reasonably prevent degradation, waste, and unlawful use of water must be enforced. Penalties should be commensurate with the severity of the hazard and/or damage, and the difficulty of apprehending the violator. Responsible agencies must be adequately funded and managed to accomplish their duties.

North Dakota Chapter Position on
the Proposed Organic Rule (Adopted 4/98)

USDA should use a precautionary, rather than a risk assessment approach in determining the materials and practices that will be allowed in organic production and processing. Using "measurable degradation" as a basis for determining the inclusion or exclusion of practices or material is unacceptable and inconsistent with the history and principles of organic. Organic has always prohibited the use of materials and practices based on the principle that they had to be proven safe, rather than merely not proven unsafe, and only allowed them on the basis of demonstrated need. USDA should use these precautionary principles in drafting the regulations.

Private certifiers must be allowed to exceed the national standard and be recognized in the marketplace for doing so. This provision is vital to the ongoing improvement of organic practices and is necessary in order for private and state certifiers to be in a level playing field, as proposed in the Senate Report. The rule also needs to clearly express that such rights of private certifiers are assured for the purpose of certifying organic products for export.

Standards for crops, livestock and handling must AT LEAST meet the requirements set forth in the National Organic Standards Board’s (NOSB) recommendations. In many instances the materials and practices allowed in the rule do not meet this requirement. This is unacceptable.

Under no circumstances should GEOs (Genetically Enhanced Organisms), irradiation, sewage sludge, or the feeding of rendered animal by-products be allowed in organic production or processing. These materials and practices are incompatible with the principles of organic systems.

The Secretary should uphold the legal authority of the NOSB to establish the National List.

With regard to labeling, we request that the right to use eco-labels such as "hormone free", "pesticide free", "humanely raised", etc. be preserved. Further, the right to use negative claims in organic production, such as "grown without antibiotics", "fed grains grown without pesticides", etc. be protected. Under no circumstances should this regulation prohibit producers from claiming that their product is produced without the use of pesticides, as noted in the Senate Report.